The mRNA Inventor They Tried to Erase: Dr. Robert Malone, Media Lies, and the Vaccine Scandal They Don’t Want You to Know

Ah yes, the mainstream media and social media overlords—those noble guardians of truth, justice, and corporate profits. They’ve done such an outstanding job of ensuring we only hear what they deem acceptable, haven’t they? Meanwhile, one of the actual pioneers of mRNA technology, Dr. Robert Malone, has been dragged through the digital mud for daring to have an opinion on the very thing he helped create. How dare he, right?

The Inventor They’d Rather You Forget

Back in the late 1980s, Dr. Malone was cooking up scientific magic, discovering how mRNA could be introduced into cells to produce proteins. No big deal—just the foundation for an entire multi-billion-dollar vaccine industry. But don’t worry, Big Pharma and its media minions will tell you someone else deserves all the credit. After all, what’s a little historical revisionism among friends?

If we followed actual logic instead of corporate-approved nonsense, we’d acknowledge Malone the same way we do the Wright brothers for airplanes or Thomas Edison for the light bulb. But instead, we’re told he’s just some crank with an X (formerly Twitter) account. Convenient, isn’t it?

Why Listen to the Guy Who Invented It?

So, what scandalous, earth-shattering statements did Dr. Malone dare to utter? Let’s take a look at the “dangerous misinformation” (a.k.a. things you weren’t supposed to hear):

1. Spike Proteins Might Be Problematic

Malone suggested that the spike proteins your body produces after an mRNA jab might not be entirely harmless. Wild, right? The idea that something newly introduced into millions of bodies worldwide should be examined more closely? Outrageous!

2. Antibody-Dependent Enhancement (ADE) Is a Thing

He raised concerns that, in some cases, vaccines can actually make diseases worse instead of better. You’d think that would be worth discussing, but nope! Off to the fact-checking guillotine he went.

3. Ivermectin: The Drug That Must Not Be Named

Oh, the sheer horror of suggesting that a drug with a long history of human use could be repurposed for COVID-19 treatment!

• Let’s clear something up for the sheeple still bleating about ivermectin being “just a horse dewormer.” Yes, there’s an animal version—just like there are animal versions of many drugs, including antibiotics. But guess what? There’s also a human version, which has been safely used for decades.
• Ivermectin won a Nobel Prize in 2015 for its effectiveness in treating parasitic infections in humans. Repeat: for humans.
• Drug repurposing is a common medical practice. Many drugs are originally designed for one purpose but are later found to be useful for another. Aspirin was originally just a pain reliever—now it’s used for heart disease prevention. Viagra was initially a blood pressure medication—now, well, you know the rest.
• The moment doctors suggested that a cheap, widely available, off-patent drug might help against COVID-19, Big Pharma lost its mind. Because why would they promote something that costs pennies when they could sell experimental vaccines for billions?

4. Maybe We Shouldn’t Rush Medical Approvals?

He dared to suggest that vaccines rushed through approval at breakneck speed might need more long-term study. The horror!

5. Mass Formation Psychosis

He described the way fear and groupthink turned societies into obedient, unquestioning followers of the official COVID narrative. And boy, did that hit a nerve. Suddenly, the media had to do everything in its power to convince us that mass formation psychosis wasn’t real—even while proving it in real time.

The Real Consequences of Rushing Vaccine Approvals

Now that time has passed, what are we seeing? A growing list of serious side effects that were initially dismissed but are now undeniable:

• Post-Vaccination Syndrome (PVS) – A Yale University study suggests that some individuals experience fatigue, brain fog, insomnia, palpitations, and muscle pain after vaccination. Researchers found high levels of spike protein in PVS patients, indicating a potential link to the vaccine. (Pending peer review.)
• Myocarditis and Pericarditis – Inflammation of the heart muscle and surrounding tissue has been observed, particularly in young males after mRNA vaccines.
• Anaphylaxis – Severe allergic reactions occurring within minutes of vaccination, requiring emergency intervention.
• Thrombosis with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome (TTS) – A rare but serious blood clotting disorder associated with AstraZeneca’s vaccine.
• Neurological Disorders – Some research suggests potential links to acute disseminated encephalomyelitis and transverse myelitis, requiring further investigation.

This is exactly why rushing approvals was reckless. Instead of prioritizing long-term safety, governments and Big Pharma pushed these products as fast as possible, silencing anyone who dared to suggest caution. And now? The side effects are undeniable.

The Media’s Laughable “Experts”

Now, let’s talk about credibility. Because while Dr. Robert Malone—a man with a medical degree, research background, and direct involvement in the development of mRNA technology—is being called a “conspiracy theorist,” the media insists we should be taking our medical advice from… drum roll please… Bill Gates and Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.

• Bill Gates – The Microsoft guy who has somehow become the media’s go-to public health guru. He has no medical degree, no experience in virology, and no scientific background beyond hiring people who do. Yet, we’re supposed to believe he understands pandemic response better than someone who actually invented the technology used in the vaccines. Makes perfect sense.
• Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus – The head of the World Health Organization (WHO)—who is not a medical doctor. Let that sink in. The man running the WHO, giving health directives to the entire planet, has a background in community health and malaria research but does not hold a medical degree. And yet, the media tells us to trust him over scientists like Dr. Malone.

And here’s where the media’s hypocrisy goes off the rails: They claim that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (RFK Jr.) shouldn’t be the Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary because he’s not a doctor. Meanwhile, they have no issue with Tedros running the WHO, despite not being a doctor himself. See the inconsistency?

Conclusion: The Man Deserves a Medal (But Will Settle for The Truth)

Dr. Robert Malone is the inventor of mRNA technology—full stop. The real scandal isn’t what Malone said. It’s the coordinated, aggressive, and frankly hilarious attempts to erase him from history. Why? Because he dared to question the status quo. And we can’t have that, can we?

The mainstream media and social media giants are not guardians of truth—they are corporate puppets doing whatever it takes to maintain control.

Dr. Malone stood for truth. So did the scientists behind the Great Barrington Declaration, such as Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, Dr. Martin Kulldorff, and Dr. Sunetra Gupta. So did many concerned Filipino doctors and citizens. And so did I.

Now, it’s our turn to stand with them—loudly, sarcastically, and unapologetically.

Disclaimer

This article is for informational and discussion purposes only and reflects personal opinions, observations, and general analysis based on publicly available information. It is not intended to make factual accusations against any individual, company, or entity.

The content should not be interpreted as alleging criminal activity, misconduct, or intentional harm by any party mentioned. References to businesses, industries, or institutions are made within the context of public discourse and should not be construed as defamatory statements.

Furthermore, any use of humor, sarcasm, or rhetorical emphasis is intended to engage readers and encourage critical thinking. These elements should not be misinterpreted as statements of fact. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research, seek professional advice where necessary, and form their own conclusions.

This article does not provide medical, legal, or financial advice, and no portion of the content should be relied upon as such.